(The World Hindu Congress of 21-23 November
2014 in Delhi, an achievement by Swami Vigyananda, compares favourably with other
similar initiatives, being more focused and free of compromise with secularism.
It offered a taste of what an unfettered Hindu society in normal non-Nehruvian
circumstances could be. One of the seven conferences was the Organizational
Conference, which concluded with a panel debate. As another speaker had
cancelled, I was asked to improvise an intervention. On the basis of
impressions gathered at the congress and in informal talks in the lobby, I
presented the following observations.)
One has to
be in sympathy with the small minority of Hindus who like to pin-prick the
hollow optimism typical of the RSS. This organization likes to style itself as the
vanguard of Hindu revival, but has not stopped Nehruism and the decline of
Hinduism. On the contrary, it plays by the rules laid down by its enemies. The
commitment to Hinduism is subordinate to the eagerness for mere trinkets, such
as the shine of secularist approval, a prize dangled before pliant
Hindutvavadis but never really given.
Many Hindus
like to boast how good Hindus are at making money, how they are the richest
immigrant community in the US, but it always proves very difficult to amass
funds for Hindu causes. And when they are available, they are squandered on
luxuries rather than on substance. It is therefore quite an achievement to get
this WHC on the rails, an event that has paid its own way thanks to the
registration fees paid by some 1800 participants. The present successful
achievement is but one of several signs of hope.
Tamas
At Hindu
gatherings I attended during the past few decades, the atmosphere was
distinctly “tamasic”. This is a concept from Hindu cosmology, where it is one
of the three elements in a tripolar model of the universe. The three are (1)
sattva, the light and transparent pole, (2) rajas, the dynamic and passionate
pole, and (3) tamas, the dark and heavy pole. Tamas means inertia, passivity,
slothfulness, confusion and resistance to innovation. It is not so good at
action, but very resourceful at inventing excuses for inaction.
That was
till recently the dominant mood at Hindu gatherings. There was endless wailing
about what the enemies did to Hindus, but no plans were devised, let alone
implemented, to remedy these injustices. There were also conspiracy theories,
the wilder the better, to explain why the enemies were both evil and powerful,
so much so that the thought of countering them did not even arise.
Incidentally, a mirror-image of these conspiracy theories is the strawman that
the secularists make of the Hindu movement: to their captive audiences, such as
the consumers of the mainstream media or the Western donors of the Christian
mission: they feed the lie that Hindu activism is evil, powerful and
diabolically clever. The use of this untruth is that it can present any
anti-Hindu action as brave and any anti-Hindu oppression as necessary.
But the
difference is that they understand the difference between lies for public
consumption and their private knowledge that Hindu activism is but a paper
tiger. Hindu activists, by contrast, believe in their own conspiracy
concoctions.
Thus, even
at the otherwise stimulating media section of this congress, the
forward-looking atmosphere was tainted only by a cursory remark premised on the
canard that the foreign media are acting out a highly motivated anti-India
strategy explaining their glaring bias and hostility. In reality, the foreign
media have no stake in India and don’t care one way or another. Their partisan
reporting results from the partisan information they are fed by their secular
sources in Delhi, who control the narrow
bottleneck of information about India. This news monopoly has existed for
decades and for all this time, it was tolerated and passively perpetuated by
the Hindu forces.
Witness the
tamasic implication of conspiracy theories: they justify and stimulate
passivity. If the enemy is wily and all-powerful, it is no use trying to
counter him, and effectively, Hindus have not bothered to combat the secularist
dominance in the mainstream media. Similarly, the very false but very common
belief that the Partition of India resulted from a British conspiracy. and not
from the application of Islam’s political doctrine to the then Indian situation,
relieves Hindus of the difficult task of analyzing Islam as a factor of
anti-India and anti-Hindu policies. This way they, along with the secularists,
can perpetuate the delusion that Islam is OK, that Hindus and Muslims have
always been brothers only separated by a colonial ‘divide and rule” policy, and
that India’s current problems with Pakistan are due to external factors, such
as the influence of the evil Americans, who count as the secret puppeteers
behind Islamic terrorism.
Against all
these mysterious forces with their hostile agendas, no serious resistance is
possible, and hence the Hindu activists have never organized one. Or have they?
The new media
At this
congress, a different sound was heard. In the media conference, so-called
“internet Hindus” have been reporting how their use of the social media has
bypassed and outwitted the MSM dominated by anti-Hindu voices. Facts are
reported through alternative channels and break through the curtain of silence
about inconvenient information. Many a time, the MSM are forced to react to
knowledge that has turned out to be common among the public, eventhough they
had at first tried to keep the lid on it.
Opinion is
being created through twitter messages. They are tailor-made for a generation
with a short attention span, and hence far more effective than newspaper articles.
They also generate quick and exciting exchanges of opinion. These twitter
debates are very successful at giving the public a gist of the opinion spectrum
that exists relative to a specific issue. They might not be as thorough as an
in-depth article, but they certainly outdo the one-sided articles that make it
through the censorship sieve of the MSM.
The new
media have played a decisive role in winning over the new generation to the
Narendra Modi campaign. That Modi won is admittedly a victory, but we should
not lose sight of the old-style struggle that made it possible. For twelve
years, Modi has had to struggle against an enormously mean secularist campaign
of defamation, inducing even an anti-Modi intrigue within the BJP. Only a year
ago, the BJP leadership tried to thwart Modi from becoming the
Prime-Ministerial candidate. It is when this old-style struggle had been won,
that the struggle for national electoral victory started and the adroit use of
the new media made a difference. So, while the BJP’s media team has an
achievement to be proud of, we should keep in mind the over-all context, where
the secularists have not disarmed and their usual viciousness will certainly
come to plague us again. Our newly acquired skills will be needed.
Corruption
A pervasive
form of tamas in society is corruption. It acts like a parasite, eating away at
the vitality of a society, and at its capacity to act. In the main, the success
of the present Hindu government will be measured by its capacity to curb
corruption. It must not only effect a conjunctural dip, but a structural
remedy. In miniature form, this very congress can serve as an acid test.
At Hindu
conferences I attended in the 1990s, quite a few worthless papers were the
result of the following corrupt practice. The organizers, starved for money,
accepted contributions from sponsors in exchange for the honour of presenting a
paper. In the present case, the organizers were approached several times for
this kind of deal, but they refused. Papers had to stand by virtue of their own
merits, not by virtue of the funds attached to them.
This
awakening to the need of more integrity and more purposeful action is part of a
larger pattern set by politicians like erstwhile Kashmir Governor Jagmohan,
former Minister of Disinvestment Arun Shourie and former Gujarat Chief Minister
Narendra Modi: to cut through the vested interests and not to let them sap the
energies of society. All three have been have been criticized by the
secularists as paragons of Hindutva. Indeed, we have it on the authority of the
secularists that those whom we know as men of integrity and as spectacularly
good administrators, are “rabid communalists”, while the opportunists and
time-servers whom they call “moderates”, are practitioners and upholders of
corruption.
Long live dynamism!
Following
this pattern, we see that the effective leadership of the World Hindu Council
(VHP) is now exercised by man who is both impeccable and a reputed Hindu
radical. Swami Vigyananda is a veteran of the Babri Masjid demolition on 6
December 1992, as well as a dynamic organizer with a modern outlook and a
remarkable skill in means, an ease in doing things. So, he had the foresight to
visualize the present congress, which he announced five years ago, and which
happens to coincide with the first Hindu government in Delhi since 1192. (Well,
I’ll grant you Hemachandra in 1556, but his rule lasted only a few weeks, until
the proverbially enlightened Moghul emperor Akbar had him beheaded.)
The window
of opportunity opened by Modi’s victory will not last forever. We must use it
to effect the needed changes in the Indian polity.
This very
congress, very well-organized as you all have noticed, and with a preponderance
of high-quality papers, proves that Hindus manage to outgrow their tamasic
pattern. Correspondingly, the mood is upbeat and creative. There are successes
to report and more to come. Down with the despondency of the past decades! Long
live the self-made Hindu spirit of achievement!
A very good read, indeed. All ministers, political leaders, newspaper editors, social science professors and office bearers of the BJP should be requested to read this. Wonder, some one resourceful could arrange it? Elst is doing his (actually, ours) job overtime. Let other players take it further.
ReplyDeleteThis kind of analyses are not only enlightening, they are creative in the sense that it regenerate your own power of seeing things as they are and help you try find ways and means for effective solutions of a problem.
Truly, disseminating such articles among thinking Indians in all languages and all places is no less valuable than organizing big seminars and congresses.
Thank you, Dr Elst! We salute you!
Before the internet days, if one had to voice one's views, he had to take recourse to the letters to editor column. Anything which did not fit the editorial policy would find its way to nearest dust bin. The other alternative for the chosen few was to write columns or occasional articles in such newspapers and magazines who would tolerate presentation of Hindu view on politics, society and religion. Expressing views in this manner required some preparation and presentation skill. With internet providing uncensored opportunity to express one's view, it is common to see shallow and thoughtless comments reaching the readers. Often such comments and exchanges are uncivil to the readers or antagonists. Such "Internet Hindus" as Dr.Elst calls, brought down the reputation of Hindu protagonists. There is no substitute, either before or during the internet age, for carefully prepared articles and papers backed by diligent research. The media and academic portals are still very much under the control of the secular brigade. Their importance can be reduced over a period of time, only by the learning to overcome their world view, not by a shouting match.Such shouting brigades bring more disrepute to Hinduism, which has good reason to hold itself out as the most intellectually satisfying religion.
ReplyDelete